You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of annotators trained and tested on CEMP and CHEMDNER corpora measured by precision (P), recall (R), f1-score (F1)

From: LSTMVoter: chemical named entity recognition using a conglomerate of sequence labeling tools

System CEMP CHEMDNER
  P R F P R F
Stanford NER 0.85 0.80 0.82 0.82 0.83 0.82
MarMoT 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85
CRF++ 0.77 0.73 0.73 0.74 0.71 0.73
MITIE 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.62 0.61 0.62
Glample 0.76 0.79 0.77 0.82 0.84 0.83
Majority vote 0.78 0.79 0.78 0.70 0.76 0.73
LSTMVoter 0.90 0.88 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.90
  1. Bold was intended to compare LSTMVoter to the best reference tool. Bold now shows the system with the highest F-Score, which is LSTMVoter
Back to article page

Journal of Cheminformatics

ISSN: 1758-2946

Contact us